[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[GNUnet-SVN] r27151 - gnunet-java

From: gnunet
Subject: [GNUnet-SVN] r27151 - gnunet-java
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 15:40:14 +0200

Author: grothoff
Date: 2013-05-15 15:40:14 +0200 (Wed, 15 May 2013)
New Revision: 27151

-comments for Florian

Modified: gnunet-java/ISSUES
--- gnunet-java/ISSUES  2013-05-15 13:39:46 UTC (rev 27150)
+++ gnunet-java/ISSUES  2013-05-15 13:40:14 UTC (rev 27151)
@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
 CLIENT_receive crashes on
 socket that could not connect before transmitting a message
 (to reproduce: run gnunet-set without a running peer)
+--- MQ bug, never receive before sending at least one MSG.
+// FIXME: zero 'reserved' field.
 I can't track down the uninitialized bytes error in gnunet-set
 (only happens once)
 ==4516== Syscall param socketcall.sendto(msg) points to uninitialised byte(s)
@@ -25,6 +27,7 @@
 test_set_api.c has some problems with the host identity
  * while the same code in gnunet-set.c works
+=> check config used
 => see util/test_server.c
@@ -35,8 +38,9 @@
 => use crypto_KDF
-what about code coverage in C?
+what about code coverage in C? cat svn/gnunet/contrib/ 
 mq should be in util
  * used by both consensus and set
  * some test cases written
@@ -45,6 +49,7 @@
 silly-ish question: how do I print a uint32_t?
 PRIu32 from inttypes.h (C99) would be the "most correct" way, but nobody uses 
+ fprintf (stderr, "%u", (unsigned int) i);
 what should happen if we can not send our responses (stream failure), but we 
already got a done?
  * either ignore it

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]