[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[donau] branch master updated: making clearer that the limitations are w
From: |
gnunet |
Subject: |
[donau] branch master updated: making clearer that the limitations are with _them_, not with our design |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jan 2025 01:43:03 +0100 |
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
tanja-lange pushed a commit to branch master
in repository donau.
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 3fc550c making clearer that the limitations are with _them_, not with
our design
3fc550c is described below
commit 3fc550c672104cb1af1dfb979cc5a5c6380ec2bf
Author: Tanja Lange <tanja@hyperelliptic.org>
AuthorDate: Thu Jan 23 01:41:58 2025 +0100
making clearer that the limitations are with _them_, not with our design
---
doc/usenix-security-2025/paper/ethic.tex | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/usenix-security-2025/paper/ethic.tex
b/doc/usenix-security-2025/paper/ethic.tex
index 187c0f0..74e1ab5 100644
--- a/doc/usenix-security-2025/paper/ethic.tex
+++ b/doc/usenix-security-2025/paper/ethic.tex
@@ -14,8 +14,9 @@ and the current approach to provide tax benefits for
donations encroaches on the
\input{threats}
\subsection{Administrative burden}
-The current mechanism also has discriminatory aspects.
-It places a higher bureaucratic cost on spreading an equivalent cumulative
amount across smaller philanthropic causes -- denying inter-sectional interests
donors may have, and disadvantaging smaller, early stage and more lean public
causes. %XXX: "earlier stage"/"leaner"?
+The current mechanisms of how tax authorities handle chartiable donations
+also has discriminatory aspects.
+It places a higher bureaucratic cost on spreading an equivalent cumulative
amount across smaller philanthropic causes -- denying intersectional interests
donors may have, and disadvantaging smaller, early stage and more lean public
causes. %XXX: "earlier stage"/"leaner"?
The latter notably includes ``niche'' causes linked to (combinations of)
cultural, sexual, ethnic, religious and social minorities.
Smaller causes often do not have the capacity to offer support for achieving
fiscal compensation to their donors, reprieving their (latent) donor
constituencies of the amplifying effects of such compensation and making them
less attractive (and thus relatively less likely) to be supported. %XXX: This
sentence does not make sense to me. "Reprieve" is not used correctly (I think),
and it's too lacking in detail to understand whether it's referring to e.g.,
membership benefits, or something [...]
@@ -26,11 +27,17 @@ We want to reverse the situation where people prefer not to
claim the tax benefi
\subsection{Access to software}
The associated software does not place any ethical dilemmas upon the users.
It is delivered as free/libre open source software, available under GNU
-Affero General Public license v3 or later in
+Affero General Public license v3 or later
\ifanonymous
-a public repository.
+and available in a public repository.
\else
-the
+in the
repository \url{git.taler.net/donau.git}.
\fi
Anyone is able to download, compile, install, modify and redistribute the
software as they wish, conditional to respecting this license.
+\ifanonymous
+We will submit the code for the artifact evaluation.
+We do not use github and thus cannot use their anonymizing tools but can make
+the code available upon request, but need some time to scrub identifying
+information.
+\fi
--
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
gnunet@gnunet.org.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [donau] branch master updated: making clearer that the limitations are with _them_, not with our design,
gnunet <=