gnunet-svn
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[donau] branch master updated (4e7e07c -> e51d592)


From: gnunet
Subject: [donau] branch master updated (4e7e07c -> e51d592)
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 07:51:52 +0100

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

jonathan-levin pushed a change to branch master
in repository donau.

    from 4e7e07c  1.1: significant rewriting and explicitly mentioning privacy 
protections from the charity itself
     new dae19b4  1.1: small reword
     new e51d592  1.1: small edits

The 2 revisions listed above as "new" are entirely new to this
repository and will be described in separate emails.  The revisions
listed as "add" were already present in the repository and have only
been added to this reference.


Summary of changes:
 doc/usenix-security-2025/paper/intro.tex | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/usenix-security-2025/paper/intro.tex 
b/doc/usenix-security-2025/paper/intro.tex
index 59e8a8e..e6b6fd5 100644
--- a/doc/usenix-security-2025/paper/intro.tex
+++ b/doc/usenix-security-2025/paper/intro.tex
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental 
Freedoms
 \subsection{Protection towards all sides}
 
 Privacy protection against outside parties is not the only concern.
-Threats to privacy may come from the receiving charity as well.
+Threats to privacy may come from the recipient charity as well.
 Even when a donor considers a
 particular philanthropic cause to be worthwhile, the charity may use
 information about the donor's past giving to aggressively solicit them for more
@@ -101,16 +101,15 @@ on a commission basis.  For-profit fund
 raising agencies often engage in privacy-invasive practices to identify and 
contact potential donors.
 One common scenario is that after a first donation, such bad actors % calling 
them "bad actors" might be unnecessarily opinionated. From a privacy 
perspective they are not good, but many organizations also rely on these 
services to not go bankrupt. -JL
 start to aggressively pressure a particular donor for more --- with 
personalized
-emails, letters, phone calls and even in person visits.
+emails, letters, phone calls and even in-person visits.
 Donor information may also be shared between organizations,
 leading to an avalanche of donation requests from organizations that the donor 
might not be interested in supporting.
 
-In the era of data driven donations and corporate social media
+In the era of data-driven donations and corporate social media
 surveillance, this kind of behavior has unfortunately become so easy
-that there are not just pro bono but even paid services (source in the
-Netherlands:
+that there are not just pro bono but even paid services (e.g.,
 \href{https://www.donateursbelangen.nl/opzegservice}{Stichting
-  Donateursbelangen}) to de-register and exercise the ``right to be
+  Donateursbelangen} in the Netherlands) to de-register and exercise the 
``right to be
 forgotten'' after donating.
 
 These concerns suggest that a privacy-preserving donation system

-- 
To stop receiving notification emails like this one, please contact
gnunet@gnunet.org.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]