[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep ROADMAP
From: |
Richard Frith-Macdonald |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep ROADMAP |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Nov 2005 08:16:49 +0000 |
On 26 Nov 2005, at 06:05, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
Here is the Roadmap:
http://mediawiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Roadmap
If you are a maintainer, please make any changes for your section
that you deem
appropriate.
Rather than changing anything, I'd like to query some things because
things on that page differ from my impressions of what's been
discussed on the mailing list, so I guess I'm missing out on stuff.
GNUstep 1.0
1. it says current base/make/back ... but what about ms-windows
support ... I'm guessing we want base/make/back fixes/improvements
for windows as it's not nearly such a good state as unix-style
systems. I'm not sure this is a 1.1 issue rather than 1.0
This also ignores the fact that window manager interaction (focus in
particular) is undoubtedly the biggest problem with current apps, and
is a backend issue at least as much as a gui issue.
2. gui seems wildly ambitious (complete coding on all existing
classes) .
I'm not sure what 'improve printing support' entails
The 'fix major bugs' is obviously required, but we should decide on
what those bugs are
I haven't heard anyone suggesting removal of classes before, and I
don't approve of the idea ... rather we should have *big* warnings
about works in progress so that people don't try to use them unless
they are also willing to work on improving them. (ie clear
information in the docs and warnings generated at runtime).
GNUstep 1.1
Integrate camaelon into gui ... I think this should be in 1.0 as a
matter of practicality ... as far as I can see, this is an easily
achievable target, so why not do it soon.
Integration of WildMenus ... I haven't looked at this, so i don't
know, but seems reasonable.
Breakup of gui and base into component libraries ... I've never heard
of this and haven't seen anything saying why it would be at all
desirable, let alone worth making into a target.
Make GNUstep more compliant with the FHS as an option ... this ought
to be quite easy ... so why not make it part of 1.0 if it's actually
a good 'selling' point?
Better Windows support ... yes ... but we need to get windows users
to define what they need improving
Nib support in gui and Gorm ... you know best on this ... very good
if you can do it in time for a 1.1 release
- GNUstep ROADMAP, Gregory John Casamento, 2005/11/26
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP,
Richard Frith-Macdonald <=
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Fabien VALLON, 2005/11/26
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Gregory John Casamento, 2005/11/26
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Fred Kiefer, 2005/11/26
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Gregory John Casamento, 2005/11/26
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2005/11/27
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Fred Kiefer, 2005/11/27
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Gregory John Casamento, 2005/11/27
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/11/28