[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep ROADMAP
From: |
Stefan Urbanek |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep ROADMAP |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Nov 2005 12:21:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 |
Citát Richard Frith-Macdonald <address@hidden>:
>
> On 28 Nov 2005, at 09:17, Stefan Urbanek wrote:
>
> > How difficult it would be to hack autogsdoc objective-c parser to
> > parse GNUstep
> > sources and generate a list of unimplemented methods (either marked
> > as not
> > implemented or being only in @interface)? Simple html table (with
> > css):
> >
> > | Class | Method | Description |
>
> Easy to get the parser to recognise empty implementations ... but
> what to do about it is not clear.
Put on the webpage: "development wanted".
> I like the idea though.
>
> How about ... if the parser could warn about empty implementations,
> so we know when something needs doing, and if no documentation
> comment is provided for the method, it could generate standard stuff
> about the method not being implemented yet (in the place where is
> currently generates the 'documentation forthcoming' message.
>
It can be good for documentation where target would be GNUstep-core developers.
However, for GNUstep users (developers of gnustep frameworks or applications)
it would be a noise in the documentation. On the other hand, it can serve as a
signal for developers that are willing to contribute...
> Generally, if a class is abstract/semi-abstract then subclasses are
> supposed to override methods ... so an empty implementation here
> could be quite OK ... but we could get the parser to check to see if
> it has seen the <override-subclass /> markup in the comment for the
> method, and accept an empty implementation as OK in that case.
>
Sounds good.
Stefan
--
http://stefan.agentfarms.net
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
you win.
- Mahatma Gandhi
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, (continued)
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Jiva DeVoe, 2005/11/27
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Fred Kiefer, 2005/11/26
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Gregory John Casamento, 2005/11/26
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2005/11/27
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Fred Kiefer, 2005/11/27
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Gregory John Casamento, 2005/11/27
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/11/28
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, David Ayers, 2005/11/28
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Stefan Urbanek, 2005/11/28
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/11/28
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP,
Stefan Urbanek <=
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Gregory John Casamento, 2005/11/28
- Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Jeremy Bettis, 2005/11/27
Re: GNUstep ROADMAP, Sheldon Gill, 2005/11/26