[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep Makes Fast Scientific Code, Faster Than Cocoa.
From: |
Gregory John Casamento |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep Makes Fast Scientific Code, Faster Than Cocoa. |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:21:39 -0700 (PDT) |
It would be really nice to do some concrete tests to get some real numbers on
this. It would definitely be something to put up on the website.
Later, GJC
--
Gregory Casamento
----- Original Message ----
From: Helge Hess <address@hidden>
To: Developer GNUstep <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2006 2:24:39 PM
Subject: Re: GNUstep Makes Fast Scientific Code, Faster Than Cocoa.
On Oct 3, 2006, at 18:17, Daniel J Farrell wrote:
> Now, not a true test by any means just a tentative suggestion from
> a large command line app. The app is basically a scientific number
> cruncher. I have run the same code, on the same computer, one
> compiled in xcode linking to Cocoa Foundation and the other
> compiled using gcc make, make install, openapp etc. linked to
> GNUstep Base. The GNUstep version is 50% faster (47.8% increase to
> be more precise).
Does GNUstep-base work with the Apple runtime or do you use the GNU
Objective-C runtime?
If you want to further optimize the issue you should have a look in
Shark. By comparing the output of the Cocoa with GNUstep binary you
should also be able to tell why GNUstep performs better in your
specific case.
Thanks,
Helge
--
Helge Hess
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev