[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal
From: |
David Chisnall |
Subject: |
Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:18:01 +0000 |
On 7 Jan 2014, at 09:23, Richard Frith-Macdonald <address@hidden> wrote:
> Good point ... I hadn't really considered the branding of the
> language/runtime.
>
> I agree that ARC is the killer feature. The others are, IMO relatively minor
> refinements not suitable to be the headline feature, or braindead/bloat in
> some way (even though they have possible good applications).
>
> However, I'm not sure that we can use the term ARC as a big selling point,
> simply because I'm not sure people will understand how good a feature it is.
I think OS X / iOS developers will, given how much effort Apple has spent on
selling it. And people who remember life before ARC will know how painful it
is to go back to the pre-ARC world[1].
> How can we brand the latest objc language/runtime so that it both sounds
> impressive without being either too technical (arc) or too vague (modern)?
>
> On the other hand, maybe calling it ObjectiveC-ARC is OK if OSX developers
> all understand it?
I would say 'All of the latest Objective-C features, including ARC'. People
who know about ObjC will most likely be explicitly looking for ARC on the
feature list, people who don't will just see the general point. And it's brief
enough to fit in a bullet point.
David
[1] On which note, I wonder if GNUstep is losing potential contributors by
requiring code in the core libraries to use manual RR...
--
This email complies with ISO 3103
- Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, (continued)
- Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2014/01/02
- Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Riccardo Mottola, 2014/01/03
- Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Riccardo Mottola, 2014/01/03
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Sebastian Reitenbach, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, David Chisnall, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Sebastian Reitenbach, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal,
David Chisnall <=
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Ivan Vučica, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, David Chisnall, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, David Chisnall, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Ivan Vučica, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, David Chisnall, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Ivan Vučica, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, David Chisnall, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Ivan Vučica, 2014/01/07
- Re: Intermediate Summary: Re: GNUstep.org website redesign proposal, Lundberg, Johannes, 2014/01/07