[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: progress

From: Chris B. Vetter
Subject: Re: progress
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 20:13:27 -0800

On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 20:47:53 -0700
Adam Fedor <address@hidden> wrote:
> David Wetzel wrote:
> > hi folks,
> > we should put Renaissance on the progress page, I think.
> > It is more important than nib2gmodel in my view.
> > what do you think?
> I just took nib2gmodel out. I want to concentrate on the main parts
> anyway.

However, it would be nice if the main page had a small notice on the
actual release version numbers for stable and unstable. I'm pretty sure
I'm not the only one who lost track...

As far as I can tell, stable has higher version numbers than unstable,
right now, 1.6.0 and 0.8.5 (for stable) to 1.5.2 and 0.8.4 (for
unstable) ???


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]