[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Other observations on

From: Adam Fedor
Subject: Re: Other observations on
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 08:28:08 -0700

On Tuesday, March 23, 2004, at 05:13 AM, MJ Ray wrote:

On 2004-03-20 12:23:49 +0000 Wim Oudshoorn <address@hidden> wrote:

* I just hacked the init script.  I do not know a lot about perl
  (which it is) and so this is probably not the /Right way/.
* It just seems a good idea to split the sidebar in a file of its own.
  But it introduce a dependency on the /cat/ program and it creates an
  an extra file to maintain.

cat is coreutils, IIRC, so probably fine, but you can replace with

$T2H_PRE_BODY_CLOSE = '</div></div></div>'.join("",<SBAR>);

I'm not sure that this is any more correct.

Sidebar is displaying incorrect text sizes here. Did you remove some style info?

We can probably generate these settings from the top directory's secondary.html.template file if we think about it hard enough. Something like:

($tmpl=~/<\/title>(.*)<\/head>.*<body>(.*<div id="main">).*(<\/div>.*)<\/body>/sm);

Well, I don't want to embed the links in the FAQ files as those might change on a different schedule and I don't want to have to keep track of that and merge it back. Do the links really need to be in the FAQ files?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]