[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: Adam Fedor
Subject: RE:
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:52:40 -0400

I want to update it as well.  I'm all for switching over as long as the major 
mirrors seems to handle it (other mirrors don't seem to be updated at all, but 
that's another issue.)

-----Original Message-----
From:   Alex Perez [mailto:address@hidden
Sent:   Mon 6/21/2004 5:22 PM
To:     Adam Fedor
Cc:     MJ Ray; address@hidden
Subject:        Re:

On Fri, 21 May 2004, Adam Fedor wrote:

> On May 21, 2004, at 6:25 PM, MJ Ray wrote:
> > On 2004-05-21 03:37:23 +0100 Adam Fedor <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> Besides I've wanted to just get rid of the progress page for a long 
> >> time.
> >
> > Shall I just replace it with a pointer to the front page?
> >
> Alex said he had some idea, but I haven't heard what it is yet.
If you dont think it should be around anyways, no proposal of mine will 
change your opinion does seem a bit unnecessary, and at the 
same time some sort of "Project Status" page would be nice, but it will 
need to be kept up to date..

> Also, what happened to the proposal to change the  sidebar links?  We 
> could probably get rid of Progress along with that change.

Agreed. I have asked several times for instructions on how to use the 
templater, where teh templating code is (not all of it appears to be in 
template/) and I have gotten no information.

Can we just switch to server-parsed shtml files? It will be so much 
cleaner and our three primary mirrors work fine with it, as I've 
re-iterated previously.

Alex Perez

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]