[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Media WIKI

From: MJ Ray
Subject: Re: Media WIKI
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 00:25:36 +0000

On 2004-12-16 19:15:00 +0000 Alex Perez <address@hidden> wrote:

Well, you might if it were functional. And please, this "FooWiki isn't a wiki because it's impure" stuff sounds alarmingly like what religious zealots say about religions besides their own [...]

I am objective. I have no idea why you rabbit about "There is no True Wiki" - are you ignorant of how wiki started? The first one, WikiWikiWeb, is still online if you want to refer to it. I say MediaWiki is not a wiki because it doesn't share enough of the WikiDesignPrinciples or reasons WhyWikiWorks (see and similar). It's OK if you disagree with my conclusion.

My comment is nothing like zealotry and it's dumb to try picking a fight with my religious beliefs.

If the software changes, I may be not be technically hindered in using the wiki, but if it's MediaWiki, wouldn't it be easier for me to edit the main site? $DEITY knows, I've had little enough time to do that lately. So, I'd best end this email and free some time now.

MJR/slef    My Opinion Only and not of any group I know
 Creative copyleft computing -
 Unsolicited attachments to the pipex address deleted
Will HLF fund tree-killings?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]