[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gnustep licensing issue

From: Peter Smith
Subject: Re: gnustep licensing issue
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 21:58:30 +0400


Thank you for the information, but I would like to take a legal advice on GNUstep licensing, whom I have to write? Does your developer society have an accessible lawyer?


On 22 February 2014 01:26, Adam Fedor <address@hidden> wrote:
I am not a lawyer, so if you want a real legal opinion, you should talk to a lawyer

My informal (not legal advice) opinion would be that if you are not distributing GNUstep then you don't have any requirements under the license.  The GPL and LGPL are both distribution licenses - if you are just allowing people to use it remotely without distributing the code or the resulting software then there are no requirements to do anything.


On Feb 21, 2014, at 6:27 AM, Peter Smith <address@hidden> wrote:

Dear Madam or Sir,


I represent the group of developers, who are in charge of creating a cloud-based product. The soft we intend to develop is considered to be proprietary, and the potential business model based on revenue from end-user per stream.


The name of the library we interested in is “gnustep”.


In fact, I would like to find out if the business model we are going to use requires any special conditions of licensing; if it does, it would be great to know from you the details.


I am looking forward to hear from you asap.


Best regards,


Gnustep-webmasters mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]