[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TLS Renegotiation problem
From: |
Florian Weimer |
Subject: |
Re: TLS Renegotiation problem |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:28:04 +0100 |
* Steve Dispensa:
> On 11/10/09 12:13 PM, "Florian Weimer" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> * Simon Josefsson:
>>
>>> So, in summary, given (my) current knowledge there is no need to either
>>> patch GnuTLS or any server application using GnuTLS.
>>
>> But GNUTLS would have to implement the extension to secure connections
>> to servers which support renegotiation.
>
> (...which support safe renegotiation using the extension - no such thing as
> safe renegotiation absent both client and server supporting the extension.)
Eh, yes, this was sort-of implied. Thanks for the correction.
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, (continued)
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Tomas Hoger, 2009/11/12
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Tomas Hoger, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Steve Dispensa, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Florian Weimer, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Steve Dispensa, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem,
Florian Weimer <=
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Tomas Hoger, 2009/11/11
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/17
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Tomas Hoger, 2009/11/18