[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Another renegotiation patch

From: Tomas Hoger
Subject: Re: Another renegotiation patch
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:05:57 +0100

On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:52:33 +0100 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:

> You are right here, on the warning alert. I've committed a fix on
> that.

Ok, thank you!

> > May I ask why?  The current default is to be strict on client side
> > regardless of the interoprability issues with unupgraded servers.
> > Why should the default change in the future to the less strict one,
> > even though fewer servers are expected to require it at that time?
> I must have been misunderstood. The strict default on the client will
> stay as is in the future. The server behavior that is permissive to
> old clients might change in the future.

My misunderstanding apparently, sorry.  But my previous point should
still be valid: as %INITIAL_SAFE_RENEGOTIATION has no impact on client,
it probably should/does not be documented in gnutls-cli manpage, or be
documented as 'default' that can not be overriden.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]