[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?
|
From: |
Werner Koch |
|
Subject: |
Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 20 Feb 2011 17:20:57 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 19:56, address@hidden said:
> Indeed, but the API is already there. If we now add an underscore, then
> we would break ABI... We could modify them in version 3 that breaks
> the ABI anyway.
Sure. Fixing an broken ABI be breaking it again might indeed not be a
good idea.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
- ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Andreas Metzler, 2011/02/17
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/17
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Andreas Metzler, 2011/02/18
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Werner Koch, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Simon Josefsson, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/19
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?,
Werner Koch <=
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Simon Josefsson, 2011/02/21
- Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/02/21
Re: ABI breakage in 2.10.4 --> 2.11.6?, Werner Koch, 2011/02/18