[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [sr #107822] Testing 3.0.2 on AIX
From: |
Bjørn Christensen |
Subject: |
RE: [sr #107822] Testing 3.0.2 on AIX |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:17:59 +0200 |
On AIX I am using xlc.
But changing to unsigned int resumed:1; would also require that RESUME_FALSE
get changed to 1.
I think for a one bit signed int variable 0 and -1 are the correct values.
-2*N-1 .. ¯1+2*N-1
/bhc
-----Original Message-----
From: anonymous [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: 30. september 2011 10:20
To: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos; Bjørn Christensen; address@hidden
Subject: [sr #107822] Testing 3.0.2 on AIX
Follow-up Comment #12, sr #107822 (project gnutls):
In that case also change:
int resumed:1 -> unsigned int resumed:1.
Which compiler are you using?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?107822>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [sr #107822] Testing 3.0.2 on AIX, (continued)
- [sr #107822] Testing 3.0.2 on AIX, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/09/29
- [sr #107822] Testing 3.0.2 on AIX, Bjørn Christensen, 2011/09/30
- [sr #107822] Testing 3.0.2 on AIX, anonymous, 2011/09/30
- [sr #107822] Testing 3.0.2 on AIX, Bjørn Christensen, 2011/09/30
- Re: [sr #107822] Testing 3.0.2 on AIX, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/09/30
- [sr #107822] Testing 3.0.2 on AIX, Bjørn Christensen, 2011/09/30
- [sr #107822] Testing 3.0.2 on AIX, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/09/30
RE: [sr #107822] Testing 3.0.2 on AIX, Bjørn Christensen, 2011/09/29
RE: [sr #107822] Testing 3.0.2 on AIX, Bjørn Christensen, 2011/09/29
RE: [sr #107822] Testing 3.0.2 on AIX,
Bjørn Christensen <=