[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures
From: |
Greg Troxel |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Nov 2013 05:46:20 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/23.4 (berkeley-unix) |
"Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden> writes:
> Greg Troxel <address@hidden>:
>> 0.001/0.4 was not ok
>
> Remind me of your OS and hardware? I want to start tracking the
> failure thresholds for these figures on different platforms. Some
> pattern might emerge.
NetBSD 6 (current stable branch), i386, 4-core ~2 year old CPU, HTT
disabled in bios
cpu0 at mainbus0 apid 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2310 CPU @ 2.90GHz, id 0x206a7
(and then 1,2,3)
pgp05JGsxrdZh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Greg Troxel, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Hal Murray, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Greg Troxel, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/11/10
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures,
Greg Troxel <=
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Greg Troxel, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Eric S. Raymond, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Hal Murray, 2013/11/11
- Re: [gpsd-dev] new regression failures, Hal Murray, 2013/11/11