[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] Meaning of negative PPS offset?
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] Meaning of negative PPS offset? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2014 23:33:16 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Gary E. Miller <address@hidden>:
> Yes, and I see why that patch broke the PPS under certain conditions.
> You may have improved it, but it is still problematic and will result
> in negative (non-sensical) offsets.
>
> > It had an error which I fixed. After the fix, I lived-tested it
> > with the GR-601W and it seems to work.
>
> Yes, the error is only under certain conditions. I'm still lookong
> at the code, but the wrong timestamp is used. It shuold be the
> time stamp when the NMEA was detected, not the time the NMEA stamp
> says it was. That creates a race.
OK. Feel free to fix it.
> > You mentioned in a previous mail that autobauding is failing for
> > you. I dimly recall that you've had this problem before and it was a
> > local config issue. That code has been stable/working for a long
> > time.
>
> I'm not ready to report on that. Just that something odd is happening to
> me. Something that did not happen in the spring. Something that is
> only happening on some of my test setups.
I hate bugs like that. :-)
I'll double-check that autobauding is still working here. I'll be
extremely surprised if isn't - AFAIK nobody has touched the code
around that in a *long* time.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [gpsd-dev] Meaning of negative PPS offset?, (continued)
Re: [gpsd-dev] Meaning of negative PPS offset?, Gary E. Miller, 2014/08/26
Re: [gpsd-dev] Meaning of negative PPS offset?, Hal Murray, 2014/08/26
Re: [gpsd-dev] Meaning of negative PPS offset?, Miroslav Lichvar, 2014/08/27