[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Feb 2015 12:32:17 -0800 |
Yo Greg!
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 14:25:34 -0500
Greg Troxel <address@hidden> wrote:
> But this raises another issue; gpsd in production or test should not
> be leaving stray shm segemnts around.
That is the current ntpd spec. If we remove the SHM while ntpd is
still alive that will hose things...
The ntpd guys are rethinking the SHM permissions, so any gpsd fix
will be very short lived. OTOH, this does seem to be a new regression.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97701
address@hidden Tel:+1(541)382-8588
pgpUuOxc_3kd2.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Greg Troxel, 2015/02/03
- Message not available
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/03
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget,
Gary E. Miller <=
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Greg Troxel, 2015/02/03
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/03
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/03
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/03
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/03
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/04
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Eric S. Raymond, 2015/02/04
- Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/04
Re: [gpsd-dev] test failures with shmget, Gary E. Miller, 2015/02/03