[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] Regression test failed on fortrex-201.log.chk
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] Regression test failed on fortrex-201.log.chk |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Jun 2015 05:15:52 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
address@hidden <address@hidden>:
> The line 154 is truncated in the check file and in the log file.
I just fixed that.
> 1.) Why does the truncated line pass the nmea0183 parser.
Because there's no check in the parser for the total number of sat records -
and probably cannot be, it varies too much across receivers.
> 2.) Why do you think, that the patch is not nessary, u-blox m8 receiver, i
> use a navilock NL-8222MP do not report satellite positions without.
Probably because the M8 switches to ublox binary mode.
> 3.) Is it more important to support this broken checkfile then the output of
> devices claiming to comform to nmea0183 version 4.1?
No. We should have a short-line test, but one isolated from the tests of
well-formed output on any particular device.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
Re: [gpsd-dev] Regression test failed on fortrex-201.log.chk, Hal Murray, 2015/06/01