[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gpsd-dev] Regression test failed on fortrex-201.log.chk
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: [gpsd-dev] Regression test failed on fortrex-201.log.chk |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Jun 2015 06:29:27 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
address@hidden <address@hidden>:
> Hello,
>
> for some reason, gpsd do not switch the m8 to u-blox mode.
>
> This is the reason, why this problem occur.
>
> I do not have a nmea0183 v4.1 spec at the hand now, but the u-blox spec says,
> that NMEA0183 v4.1 added a signal id field at the end of the xxGSV sentence.
>
> For the u-blox m8, you can switch to nmea0183 v4.0 compatibility with the
> windows u-center software.
>
> Until gpsd is able to switch a m8 receiver to u-blox mode, we will get a lot
> of support requests.
>
> And on the long term, i think, that we can not ignore the new revision 4.1 of
> the standard..
>
> Reinhard
That is useful information. Can you point me at a copy of the u-blox spec
that describes this field?
Clearly the ubx driver is going to need some work to support the m8.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
Re: [gpsd-dev] Regression test failed on fortrex-201.log.chk, Hal Murray, 2015/06/01