gpsd-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gpsd-dev] Skytraq Venus 6 config, Was: ✘Patch queue is empty?


From: Mike
Subject: Re: [gpsd-dev] Skytraq Venus 6 config, Was: ✘Patch queue is empty?
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:17:41 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0

On 07/20/2016 01:15 PM, Gary E. Miller wrote:
Yo Mike!

On Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:08:11 -0400
Mike <address@hidden> wrote:

I searched for quite some time looking for a way using something
other than Windows to configure this module.
Here is the only real attempt that I found.

_https://github.com/r0ro/skytraq
Someone that cares should roll the few important parts into gpsctl.

On my list, but not very high up.
Probably not surprising I'm rather confused here!  Should gpsctl see
that I have a Skytraq device?
It should.  But I just added Skytraq to git head for next release, and I
did not get to checking/fixing gpsctl yet.

/dev/ttyAMA0 identified as a NMEA0183 at 38400 baud.
Well, when the Skytraq is NMEA mode it takes a while to go from
NMEA0183 to Skytraq,  That needs to be looked at.

I see now indication looking through the output that gpsctl even
tried to identify a Skytraq device.
Yeah, and it shoulda worked, but new and untested.  You are on git head,
right?  You likely are if you saw anything Skytraq related.

Am I missing something painfully obvious?
No, the code is likely missing something painfully obvious.  Certainly
untested, and should be before next release.

gpsctl need to detect Skytraq, set from nmea to binary modes and back, and
send arbitrary commands.  Then fancy stuff can be added.

RGDS
GARY
Okay so I haven't totally lost it yet... Yes, I am on git head, pulled and built last night.

If there is something I can test let me know. I'm back to trying to figure out exactly what sets the NMEA delivery to top of second. Trying to reset to factory default doesn't appear to be working as documented in their manual.

Mike



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]