[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: master fails to build/check
From: |
Greg Troxel |
Subject: |
Re: master fails to build/check |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:31:13 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (berkeley-unix) |
The reason I didn't see this before is that I used to have scons
installed against python3.7, but I recently ended up changing the
installed scons to the 2.7 version from the 3 version. In theory things
shouldn't care (and by the same theory every scons script out there
should run correctly with any version of python; note bridge for sale),
but pkgsrc currently requires scons to be built for the same python as
the package being built as part a desire for repeatable builds.
SConstruct compiles python programs using sys.executable, rather than
target_python, and this resulted in a 2.7 compilation of a 3.x-only
program as part of scons check.
The following change uses target_python instead of whatever is being
used for scons:
diff --git a/SConstruct b/SConstruct
index 3f7dff6f5..21ae0fddd 100644
--- a/SConstruct
+++ b/SConstruct
@@ -2094,7 +2094,7 @@ if env['python'] and not cleaning and not helping:
for p in python_all:
# split in two lines for readability
check_compile.append('cp %s tmp.py; %s -tt -m py_compile tmp.py;' %
- (p, sys.executable))
+ (p, target_python_path))
# tmp.py may have inherited non-writable permissions
check_compile.append('rm -f tmp.py*')
Strictly, in a cross world this is perhaps not 100% right, as there is
some blurring between target and build host. But, I think "scons
check", just like any other "make check", cannot function in a cross
world, so that's ok.
With this change. sys.executable is used only as the default value of
target_python if none is defined, and that seems like a good situation.
Any reason this is wrong, and if so what's the right fix?
- master fails to build/check, Greg Troxel, 2020/01/25
- Re: master fails to build/check,
Greg Troxel <=
- Re: master fails to build/check, Greg Troxel, 2020/01/25
- Re: master fails to build/check, Greg Troxel, 2020/01/25
- Re: master fails to build/check, Gary E. Miller, 2020/01/25
- Re: master fails to build/check, Ladislav Michl, 2020/01/30
- Re: master fails to build/check, Gary E. Miller, 2020/01/30
- Re: master fails to build/check, Ladislav Michl, 2020/01/31
- Re: master fails to build/check, Ladislav Michl, 2020/01/31
- Re: master fails to build/check, Gary E. Miller, 2020/01/31
- Re: master fails to build/check, Ladislav Michl, 2020/01/31
- Re: master fails to build/check, Gary E. Miller, 2020/01/31