[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ✘nmea.lasttag
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
Subject: |
Re: ✘nmea.lasttag |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Apr 2020 17:00:42 -0700 |
Yo Hal!
On Tue, 07 Apr 2020 16:29:26 -0700
Hal Murray <address@hidden> wrote:
> address@hidden said:
> > I agree with you that an array will be needed. But the simple bit
> > set and test will be gone. It will have to be some small
> > functions.
>
> Just use a simple array of bytes. That will cost a few bytes of
> storage but keep the code simple.
Closer to 64 byes more, but whose counting? And clearing a 72 byte
array is more work than zeroing an integer.
But it will be something like that...
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
address@hidden Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpDPlevZ2i5R.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- ✘nmea.lasttag, Gary E. Miller, 2020/04/07
- Re: ✘nmea.lasttag, Michael J. Tubby B.Sc. MIET, 2020/04/07
- Re: ✘nmea.lasttag, Gary E. Miller, 2020/04/07
- Re: ✘nmea.lasttag, Hal Murray, 2020/04/07
- Re: ✘nmea.lasttag,
Gary E. Miller <=
- Re: ✘nmea.lasttag, Fred Wright, 2020/04/07
- Re: ✘nmea.lasttag, Gary E. Miller, 2020/04/07
- Re: ✘nmea.lasttag, Gary E. Miller, 2020/04/07
- Re: ✘nmea.lasttag, Hal Murray, 2020/04/07
- Re: ✘nmea.lasttag, Gary E. Miller, 2020/04/08