Re: gpsprof: higher resolution

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo John!

On Sun, 16 Aug 2020 19:03:42 -0400
John Ackermann N8UR <jra@febo.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the info, Gary.  The problem isn't the processing or
> display precision, it's (I think) that the autoscaling is failing to
> act reasonably when the range is very small.  As you note, the result
> might not actually be "wrong" given the few pixels that 9 places of
> precision may span, but it doesn't look so good. :-)

"good" is in the eye of the beholder.  I sent you where to start to play
to make it to your taste.

> The version I'm using for this particular task is whatever is 
> distributed with Linux Mint -- I know it's old, but I don't normally
> use this machine for GPS tasks so never did a local build.  If the
> newer version is likely to behave differently, I can certainly
> arrange to use it.

A very old version.  Many things changed and improved from yours.
New plot types, new on plot statistics, better layout, etc.  The
statistics now conform mto MIL-STD.

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
        gem@rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

            Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin

pgp8EnGEjlIZk.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature