[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: my total miserable failed experiment with PPP and rtklib
From: |
Gary E. Miller |
Subject: |
Re: my total miserable failed experiment with PPP and rtklib |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Jul 2023 14:12:43 -0700 |
Yo Hans!
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 22:26:36 +0200
Hans Mayer <gpsd@ma.yer.at> wrote:
> I was fascinated about this article
> https://gpsd.gitlab.io/gpsd/ppp-howto.html Therefore I tried it.
> I own a ZED-F9P from U-blox with a fix mounted antenna on the roof of
> my house.
Cool.
> I run 6 times a 24 hour job with the config after reset of my u-blox
> ZED-F9P ( defined as config1 for my me and my tests )
>
> I calculated the distance between any of these results and it was not
> bigger than 37.2 cm.
That sounds about right. But no need to calculate, just use gpsprof.
> the next test was to use “dynModel 2”. ( 2 = stationary ) ( I
> called it config4 )
>
> I expected better results. But this wasn’t the case.
Note that "dynModel" standds for Dynamic Model. When you average over
24 hours there are no dynamics.
> The maximum distance between these results was 22.2 cm. Between all
> 12 measurements it is 40 cm. But the distance for these averaged
> values for config1 and config4 is only 2.4 cm.
As above, best to just post your gpsprof png.
> Therefore I expected the real position of the fixed mounted antenna
> on the roof of my house will be the average value within a circle of
> about 20 cm but maybe even less.
Maybe, maybe not. Not all GPS errors cancel each other out over time.
> Later on I stumbled over rtklib. It offers a lot of tools and one of
> the programs is rtkrcv. It gives the possibility of a more precision
> position for a "rover" with the correction from the "base" station.
ftklib has not had many updates in a decade. Better to use a PPP
service. Much better.
> Currently I don't have two stations. Only one, the fix mounted as
> "rover". So I registered myself for these public available ntrip
> streams. As base station I selected one near my position.
A good base should be less than a km from you. How far is your base?
> And this was the surprising result: the distance to the average
> position, which I was calculating previously, was more than 1.1 meter.
Normal, if your base is not within <100 m.
> Probably I have done something wrong.
See above.
> Or is my assumption is wrong
> that 12 times 24 hours PPP measurement gives an accurate value ?
GPS orbits repeat almost exactly every 12 hours, so any multiple of 12 hours
is good. Unless you are also using other constellations, then it gets
trickier.
> Is there anywhere a forum to discuss rtklib with others ? Didn't
> find anything till now.
There may be better places, but some people here still use it. You'll get
better results with a PPP service.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
pgpF2ttXgkP6g.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- my total miserable failed experiment with PPP and rtklib, Hans Mayer, 2023/07/24
- Re: my total miserable failed experiment with PPP and rtklib,
Gary E. Miller <=
- Re: my total miserable failed experiment with PPP and rtklib, Greg Troxel, 2023/07/24
- Re: my total miserable failed experiment with PPP and rtklib, Hans Mayer, 2023/07/25
- Re: my total miserable failed experiment with PPP and rtklib, Gary E. Miller, 2023/07/25
- Re: my total miserable failed experiment with PPP and rtklib, Greg Troxel, 2023/07/25
- Re: my total miserable failed experiment with PPP and rtklib, Gary E. Miller, 2023/07/25
- Re: my total miserable failed experiment with PPP and rtklib, Greg Troxel, 2023/07/25
- Re: my total miserable failed experiment with PPP and rtklib, Gary E. Miller, 2023/07/25