groff-commit
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[groff] 06/07: Revert "doc/groff.texi: Document CSTR #54 erratum."


From: G. Branden Robinson
Subject: [groff] 06/07: Revert "doc/groff.texi: Document CSTR #54 erratum."
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 04:04:04 -0400 (EDT)

gbranden pushed a commit to branch master
in repository groff.

commit 0670014274004af3aace1b2bd5194cb4d0340c37
Author: G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Sat Jul 10 16:08:46 2021 +1000

    Revert "doc/groff.texi: Document CSTR #54 erratum."
    
    This reverts commit 22538f26b866797f5d4c462286ca0d7028a019bf.
    
    Spoke to soon on this one; see
    https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2021-07/msg00034.html and
    follow-ups.
---
 doc/groff.texi | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/groff.texi b/doc/groff.texi
index 0d2f5e6..b1b8897 100644
--- a/doc/groff.texi
+++ b/doc/groff.texi
@@ -11746,11 +11746,6 @@ same location on the page, so the strings are equal.  
If
 @samp{.ft@tie{}I} had been added before the @samp{.ie}, the result would
 be ``false'' because (the first) @samp{|} produces an italic @samp{|}
 rather than a roman one.
-@cindex CSTR@tie{}#54 errata
-@cindex CSTR@tie{}#54 erratum, output-equivalence conditional operator
-This is also how this comparison operator worked in @acronym{AT&T}
-@code{troff}, but its manual said it tested whether its comparands were
-``identical''.
 
 @cindex string comparison
 @cindex comparison of strings



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]