[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] grog and mom.
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] grog and mom. |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jun 2002 16:46:31 +0100 |
Hi Werner,
> > Can we pick one, preferably the more portable grog.sh, and work on
> > that one being correct? What advantage does the perl version have?
>
> I'm a bad shell *and* a bad perl programmer, so I really can't
> comment. I fully agree with you that having two versions is not
> necessary. The advances in autoconf show what is really possible in
> shell programming, so perhaps it is a good idea to concentrate on
> perl.sh, using only standard tools (as documented in autoconf).
>
> Will you do that?
OK, I'll work on improving grog.sh and making it the only
implementation. I was thinking, some kind of debug/verbose option that
spits out what it saw in its input would be handy for when people say
`it got it wrong'.
Cheers,
Ralph.
Re: [Groff] grog and mom., Werner LEMBERG, 2002/06/07
- Re: [Groff] grog and mom.,
Ralph Corderoy <=