[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Re: What's missing for Unicode support of groff?
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Re: What's missing for Unicode support of groff? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 08:02:46 +0100 (CET) |
> The \{...\} construct might be critical as well. So the best way
> might be to replace c+ or c\{1,\} by cc*
>
> sed -e 's/^.* \([^ ][^ ]*\)$/\1/' -e '1q'
I use this -- I find it easier to readn than `\{1,\}'.
Thanks to all for your help. I've fixed this now in the CVS. Please
test.
Werner
[Groff] Re: What's missing for Unicode support of groff?, D. E. Evans, 2005/12/11
Re: [Groff] Re: What's missing for Unicode support of groff?, Bernd Warken, 2005/12/11