[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Groff] Re: groff + mp
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
[Groff] Re: groff + mp |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:38:48 +0100 (CET) |
> >> I see a difference in approaches. You are after metapost for
> >> groff (metapost pictures in groff document), while I am after
> >> groff for metapost (groff-made labels in metapost output).
> >
> > Exactly. Thus my remark to merge both approaches into a single
> > script. To make such a script user-friendly is probably the most
> > work...
>
> >> I want us to try to push groff support into the next metapost
> >> version.
What do you want the MetaPost people do?
> 1. Recognize that there are 2 users of troff labels in metapost.
:-)
> The scripts are user-friendly for us.
Mhmm, not really.
> Since I run metapost from make for the most time,
> running one more script is not a problem.
At least the options `--help' and `--version' should do something...
> (As I have already done with my previous patch to dmp, that
> enabled groff support, but did not jettison the remnants of the
> support for Ma Bell troff.
I think there are good chances that such patches are applied to the
MetaPost source files.
> BTW. I think the latter support was broken netertheless. Can you
> check?)
I can't. I don't have an old troff running.
Werner
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/03
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/10
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/11
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/12
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/12
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/12
- [Groff] Re: groff + mp, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/13