[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] \*[SN] question
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] \*[SN] question |
|
Date: |
Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:51:17 +0100 (CET) |
> Note: The above doesn't (yet) work, because NH explicitly uses
> SN-DOT in the header. However, I see no reason it couldn't use SN.
> Werner?
I'm leaving this to Keith...
Werner
- [Groff] \*SN] question, Joerg van den Hoff, 2007/02/12
- RE: [Groff] \*SN] question, Ted Harding, 2007/02/12
- Re: [Groff] \*SN] question, Joerg van den Hoff, 2007/02/13
- Re: [Groff] \*[SN] question, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2007/02/13
- Message not available
- Re: [Groff] \*[SN] question, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2007/02/14
- Re: [Groff] \*[SN] question, joerg van den hoff, 2007/02/15
- Re: [Groff] \*[SN] question, Keith MARSHALL, 2007/02/15
- Re: [Groff] \*[SN] question, joerg van den hoff, 2007/02/15
- Re: [Groff] \*[SN] question, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2007/02/16
- Re: [Groff] \*[SN] question,
Werner LEMBERG <=