[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] Groff Digest, Vol 106, Issue 3
From: |
Clarke Echols |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] Groff Digest, Vol 106, Issue 3 |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Jul 2013 08:46:32 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 |
Back in the 1980s, I knew an engineer at Bell Labs who used troff
and he always pronounced it tee-roff. All of the people at HP who
used it also pronounced it the same way.
Likewise, at HP, we always prounounced nroff as en-roff, so the
logical way to pronounce groff would be gee-roff.
I've never heard professional Unix/Linux users pronounce them any
other way.
Same with vi (which is essentially an acronym for "visual interactive").
It's always been pronounced vee-eye, but vim is pronounced the same as
when used when referring to "vim and vigor".
I still refer to vim as vi out of habit, and because I've used it for
nearly 30 years. I created a shell alias so when I invoke the command
from the terminal window I always type "vi".
Clarke
On 07/28/2013 03:29 AM, Tethys wrote:
Robert Marks writes:
Actually, how is troff pronounced? Troff? T-roff?
And groff? Hardly G-roff but possible.
When I first encountered them in the '80s, they were pronounced
n-roff and t-roff, so those names stuck and thus groff became
g-roff when it came along a bit later.
Tet
- Re: [Groff] Groff Digest, Vol 106, Issue 3, Robert Marks, 2013/07/28
- Re: [Groff] Groff Digest, Vol 106, Issue 3, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/07/28
- Re: [Groff] Groff Digest, Vol 106, Issue 3, Tethys, 2013/07/28
- Re: [Groff] Groff Digest, Vol 106, Issue 3,
Clarke Echols <=
- Re: [Groff] Groff Digest, Vol 106, Issue 3, Ali Gholami Rudi, 2013/07/28