Re: [Groff] Suggested patch to post-html.cpp

[Steffen Nurpmeso]

Hey, Robert,

Robert Bocchino <address@hidden> wrote:
 |> ..I agree with Betrand: it would be better to understand the code
 |> paths as such.
 |
 |I definitely agree, although as I said to Bertrand, I think \
 |the first goal should be to get system tests in place.
 |
 |> I personally would be happy if there would be input <=> expected
 |> output tests available that could be driven by make(1) / sh(1)
 |> / awk(1).
 |> But having input <=> expected output datasets available at all
 |> would be just plain fantastic, especially if under GPL2 or ISC or
 |> another really free license!
 |
 |I agree!

Great :)

--steffen