Re: [Groff] Question about .substring

[Carsten Kunze]

Ingo Schwarze <address@hidden> wrote:

> > While that is true...  The current behaviour is an unusable
> > mystery to me personally: how can you gain a substring of length
> > null,
> 
>   .rm myname
>   .ds myname ""

This defines " for myname.

>   .ds myname \&

But

.ds myname

could be added to the list.

BTW:  Why doesn't .fl work with GNU nroff?

Carsten