Re: [Groff] groff developments - query about any interest?

[John Gardner]

Eh, that's a good point, actually. Not to mention the name is a little
misleading in sounding like a replica of `nroff`.

I'll probably split it into two modules, one called "roff" that provides
the "lower-level" functionality I described, and another called "man-pages"
that uses it for easy/obvious manpage generation.

On 28 November 2016 at 12:54, Larry Kollar <address@hidden> wrote:

>
> > Peter Schaffter <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016, John Gardner wrote:
> >> ...I've decided the project *will *be named on NPM as *nroff*,
> >> with the human-readable title being "Node-Roff".  Since any
> >> *reasonable* person can see why that's an appropriate name for a
> >> *node-based roff* generator.
> >
> > For all that I appreciate the nod towards history, I'm not sure it's
> > a good idea to muddy the roff-nroff-troff-groff waters further by
> > choosing nroff.  My two cents.
>
> I agree. If it’s node-*based* roff, why not nbroff instead?
>
>         Larry
>
>
>