[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] It is time to modernise "groff"
|
From: |
Peter Schaffter |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] It is time to modernise "groff" |
|
Date: |
Wed, 8 Nov 2017 14:56:10 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017, Gour wrote:
> Let me say that the reason to loook (again) at groff was the fact that Pandoc
> got support for creating groff output as stated in its release notes:
>
> "New output format ms (groff ms). Complete support, including tables, math,
> syntax highlighting, and PDF bookmarks. The writer uses texmath’s new eqn
> writer to convert math to eqn format, so a ms file produced with this writer
> should be processed with groff -ms -e if it contains math."
>
> but I'm still not clear whether it means one can use mom package as well?
Not with Pandoc.
--
Peter Schaffter
http://www.schaffter.ca