[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [groff] mom manpage
From: |
G. Branden Robinson |
Subject: |
Re: [groff] mom manpage |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2018 19:05:07 -0500 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20180716 |
At 2018-12-11T18:14:11+0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> A small patch clarifying, within the manual page itself, what the manual
> page is, and what it is not, as far as Peter thinks that is useful and
> currently lacking, would be OK before release, i think,
I'm happy to defer whatever Peter and Bertrand can agree upon, but I
note that the page already says:
"mom comes with her own very complete documentation in HTML format. A
separate PDF manual, Producing PDFs with groff and mom, covers full mom
or PDF usage."
Moreover, full-path file specifications to those documents are offered
immediately thereafter.
I think the message that the man page is incomplete is pretty strongly
implied.
Admittedly, "what the man page _is_", however, isn't.
> because a small patch to a manual page is unlikely to cause a
> distraction to release preparation work and almost certainly won't
> break the build or introduce a bug.
Does that mean I can push my other pending changes after all? :P :P :P
Regards,
Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [groff] mom manpage, (continued)