[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GNU eqn question/suggestion

From: Tadziu Hoffmann
Subject: Re: GNU eqn question/suggestion
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:43:56 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13)

> element of set is '\[mo]'. Would it still be logical to expand
> the synax for eqn to add it as a keyword?

I would just put something like

  define member % type relation \[mo] %
  define emptyset % \[es] %

and so on into my own eqnrc file, then you can say

  x member emptyset

and so on.

(Set GROFF_TMAC_PATH to the name of the directory that contains
the eqnrc, so that it will be found automatically.)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]