groff
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TUHS] A few observations regarding tbl


From: Oliver Corff
Subject: Re: [TUHS] A few observations regarding tbl
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 15:34:38 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1

Hi Doug,

your reply proves that if is worth paying attention to *every* detail.

Anyway, once I had recognized that trailing spaces alter the
interpretation of a '_' in first and (not any longer) only position of
an input line, I paid attention to checking all instances. Usually they
spaces were generated by a block fill when I had yanked and inserted
blocks of columns with the Ctrl-V feature of vim.

Best regards,

Oliver.


On 17/06/2021 14:02, Douglas McIlroy wrote:
I disagree with one point in this interesting and thoughtful post.

  2) The global option "nospaces", according to the manpage, is described
as:
      Ignore leading and trailing spaces in data items (GNU tbl only).

  The following point may be a question of correct interpretation of this
  statement. Does the underbar "_" qualify as a data item in this
  terminology? I positively think so, because the manpage states

      If  a  data  line  consists of only ‘_’ or ‘=’, a single or double
  line, respectively, is drawn across the table at that point;
The post goes on to suggest that under option "nospaces" a data line
consisting of an underbar followed by a space should be interpreted
as if it had been a bare underbar, signifying a line across the whole
table.

I agree that an underbar followed by a space qualifies as a data item.
However, the man page clearly distinguishes between "data item" and
"data line". Ignoring spaces in a data item does not destroy its
itemhood. It does not magically become a data line.

Doug



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]