[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DISCUSSION] Grub2 Improvements
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: [DISCUSSION] Grub2 Improvements |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:37:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.2 |
On Monday 15 August 2005 09:27, address@hidden wrote:
> I would agree with this. We should have a stable basis on which we can
> improve grub2. There are so many improvments, e.g. vesafb module and
> many others, and later a graphical menu, but we dont have a structure
> for a menu entry (or a stable). Other modules/improvement uses this
> basis and when this basis changes, parts of grub2/modules must be
> rewritten to fit to the basis. We should create a list of improvments
> (all the improvments which occurs in the list) and set priorities. We
> should cralify which improvements apear in the next release and which
> not, ...
Do not use "we should", when "we" do not include yourself.
I do not like your idea. I have already said that we do not need branching at
the moment. If you need stability, use GRUB Legacy. That's it.
Okuji
Re: [DISCUSSION] Scripts and menus, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2005/08/14
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Scripts and menus, Vladimir Serbinenko, 2005/08/14
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Scripts and menus, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2005/08/14
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Scripts and menus, Vladimir Serbinenko, 2005/08/14
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Scripts and menus, Marco Gerards, 2005/08/15
- [Patch] Scripting engine, Vladimir Serbinenko, 2005/08/24
- Re: [Patch] Scripting engine, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2005/08/28
- Re: [Patch] Scripting engine, Vladimir Serbinenko, 2005/08/28
- Re: [Patch] Scripting engine, Marco Gerards, 2005/08/31