[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LDFLAGS
|
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
|
Subject: |
Re: LDFLAGS |
|
Date: |
Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:08:10 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.2 |
On Saturday 15 April 2006 16:06, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> If we take "compiler" to mean "gcc", then LDFLAGS contains gcc options,
> and should never be used directly by ld. It is worth noting that there
> is no standard LD variable, suggesting (as I have heard others suggest)
> that we should not be invoking ld directly. I will try out that patch.
I agree. We should not invoke ld directly, if possible...
But please don't remove genmk.rb. I don't want to maintain huge Makefiles.
Okuji