[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: multiboot2: using tags in the multiboot header
|
From: |
Hollis Blanchard |
|
Subject: |
Re: multiboot2: using tags in the multiboot header |
|
Date: |
Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:07:23 -0600 |
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 21:23 +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>
> Is it a good spec which forces one to use sample code to be error-free?
Please be serious.
I'm really not sure why you have such strong objections to this. We're
talking about a change that is MINOR in terms of code, but will make the
interface cleaner and more convenient for everybody. Please take a step
back and consider.
-Hollis
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional, Marco Gerards, 2006/12/02
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional, Marco Gerards, 2006/12/04
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional, Hollis Blanchard, 2006/12/05
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2006/12/05
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional, Hollis Blanchard, 2006/12/07
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2006/12/12
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional, Hollis Blanchard, 2006/12/12
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2006/12/13
- Re: multiboot2: make multiboot header optional, Marco Gerards, 2006/12/13