[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: netboot/UNDI status
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: netboot/UNDI status |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:49:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.4 |
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 16:46, Douglas Ward wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 12:38:31PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> >> But to be honest, there are more important issues than networking in
> >> the short term...
> >
> > ACK. Let's focus on what GRUB excels at, instead of trying to compete
> > with etherboot just yet...
>
> actually what i need isn't something that competes with etherboot/gpxe
> but something that competes with pxelinux.
I hate using the word "compete". There is no fact that we are competitors.
Their targets are simply different, and we have been collaborating with
etherboot/gpxe.
Okuji
- netboot/UNDI status, Douglas Ward, 2008/01/21
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/23
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Robert Millan, 2008/01/23
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/23
- Re: netboot/UNDI status,
Yoshinori K. Okuji <=
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Robert Millan, 2008/01/24
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/24
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/25
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Robert Millan, 2008/01/25
- Re: netboot/UNDI status, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/01/25