[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Yoshinori K. Okuji
Sat, 4 Apr 2009 05:16:10 +0900
On Saturday 04 April 2009 04:56:14 Bean wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Yoshinori K. Okuji <address@hidden> wrote:
> > At r2010, Bean added fake_bios_data, and this function calls grub_printf.
> > Why not grub_dprintf? Was there any reason to print a message on the
> > screen?
> Well, I'm actually planning to move fake_bios_data to a separate
> module loadbios, so that linux loader would be cleaner.
I am afraid that you've got a disease of making more modules. This is a bad
disease. I have seen some projects which failed in refactoring due to this
disease (e.g. Zope3).
> The message is
> for debug purpose, it could be replaced with grub_dprintf.
- r2010, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2009/04/03
- Re: r2010, Bean, 2009/04/03
- Re: r2010,
Yoshinori K. Okuji <=