[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should the website still say that GRUB 2 is currently under developm
Re: Should the website still say that GRUB 2 is currently under development?
Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:25:26 +0200
Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 18:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:45:35AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, adrian15 wrote:
> > > Felix Zielcke escribió:
> > > > I think the currently under development part can be now removed.
> > > > Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which hopefully
> > > > comes before December)
> > > That would be nice because Debian freezes at December.
> > I don't see anything wrong with being "under development". I hope that
> > GRUB 2 will be under development even after the 1.97. I don't see how
> > Debian can have any problem with that.
> It depends. If we say GRUB 2 is "under development" but we don't say anything
> about GRUB Legacy, people might think GRUB 2 is not ready.
> I agree with Pavel, saying GRUB 2 is under development doesn't fail to the
> truth, but then again there are many ways of saying the truth. I think we
> should make the website give a clear message that:
> a) GRUB Legacy is obsolete and we don't longer support it
> b) GRUB 2 is more mature than GRUB Legacy
Good idea. I just think that I'm not good at proposing a good wording
And maybe we should wait untill 1.97 gets released before telling grub2
is more mature then grub-legacy.
Proud Debian Maintainer
- Re: Should the website still say that GRUB 2 is currently under development?,
Felix Zielcke <=