[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: Felix Zielcke
Subject: Re: [RFC] Eliminate NESTED_ATTR_FUNC
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:49:49 +0200

Am Donnerstag, den 03.09.2009, 17:36 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 12:20:19PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Oh, I was wrong previously, gcc does respect __attribute__
> > ((__regparm__ (3))) flag (I forget to add -Os so it still uses stack
> > to store value). And the bug is still there ! Try this test program:
> Thanks Bean.  I have opened an entry in GCC bugzilla, and submitted your
> test program in it:
> Hopefully they'll fix it in later versions, and hopefully people will
> upgrade soon.  In the meantime, we're stuck with it.

Is there any reason why we fallback to regparm 1 and not to regparm 2?
According to the output of the testcase in the above bug report 2 seems
to work too?

Felix Zielcke
Proud Debian Maintainer

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]