[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC] Tagged mbi

From: Robert Millan
Subject: Re: [RFC] Tagged mbi
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 22:08:41 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 10:12:51PM +0100, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko 
> Hello. Currently mbi contains a lot of pointers and substructures. It's
> has various problems like:
> -Unused fields occupy space if any subsequent fields is used.
> -Difficult to relocate since it may be spilled all over the memory
> -It's unstraightforward to e.g. specify 2 framebuffers

Seems like there's a problem indeed.

> I propose to use tagged MBI.

Can you provide a short explanation on this proposed solution?  You explained
the problem, but not the solution.

Robert Millan

  "Be the change you want to see in the world" -- Gandhi

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]