[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon
From: |
Colin Watson |
Subject: |
Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:12:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:10:44AM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
> On 9/25/2010 4:25 PM, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> > Hello, all. I've just finished Reed-Solomon and pushedit to
> > branches/solomon. About 8 sectors (including MBR) aren't protected by
> > Reed-Solomon. Obviously it can be improved but that would be for post-1.99
>
> So you are adding bit error detection and correction to the boot loader?
> You realize that the hard disk already does reed-solomon right? So a
> second layer of it doesn't seem to have much point.
You're missing context.
--
Colin Watson address@hidden
- [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2010/09/25
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Phillip Susi, 2010/09/27
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon,
Colin Watson <=
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Phillip Susi, 2010/09/27
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Lennart Sorensen, 2010/09/27
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Phillip Susi, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Colin Watson, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Phillip Susi, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko, 2010/09/28
- Re: [RFT] Reed-Solomon, Manoel Rebelo Abraches, 2010/09/27