[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: encrypted partitions aren't recognized in a good way
From: |
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko |
Subject: |
Re: encrypted partitions aren't recognized in a good way |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:49:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110626 Iceowl/1.0b2 Icedove/3.1.11 |
Moving to grub-devel.
On 20.07.2011 14:27, devkral wrote:
> Hello,
> the scripts to generate a grub.cfg file doesn't find lvm under encrypted
> partitions (arch).
> Debian has fixed this problem elsewise but it would be nice to have a clean
> way detecting such partitions.
> I attach a patch to do so with an alternative /etc/grub.d/10_linux file
> (cryptgrub2.patch).
>
> Cryptswapgrub2.patch includes also a fix
> for hibernation support with encrypted swap-partitions (it includes
> every swap device in fstab invoked by the "resume=" command in the kernel
> argument list,
> so I'm not sure if this hasn't annoying consequences).
>
These options are distro-specific but it's ok to provide the debian ones
and let distros handle the differences. On the other hand this uses
third-party tools which shouldn't be necessary since grub in bzr trunk
already has LUKS support. Could you use our own grub-probe as base? Also
we should supply the LUKS UUID and not underlying device since it's
subject to change.
> Regards,
> Alex
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-grub mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-grub
--
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: encrypted partitions aren't recognized in a good way,
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko <=