grub-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] date_unit_test: test dates outside of 32-bit unix ran


From: Daniel Kiper
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] date_unit_test: test dates outside of 32-bit unix range
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 18:26:43 +0200
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)

On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 08:30:23PM +0300, Vladimir Serbinenko wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tests/date_unit_test.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/date_unit_test.c b/tests/date_unit_test.c
> index 99774f199..a489fc3d8 100644
> --- a/tests/date_unit_test.c
> +++ b/tests/date_unit_test.c
> @@ -25,12 +25,13 @@
>  #include <grub/test.h>
>
>  static void
> -date_test (grub_int32_t v)
> +date_test (grub_int64_t v)
>  {
>    struct grub_datetime dt;
>    time_t t = v;
>    struct tm *g;
>    int w;
> +  grub_int64_t back = 0;
>
>    g = gmtime (&t);
>
> @@ -38,28 +39,33 @@ date_test (grub_int32_t v)
>
>    w = grub_get_weekday (&dt);
>
> -  grub_test_assert (g->tm_sec == dt.second, "time %d bad second: %d vs %d", 
> v,
> +  grub_datetime2unixtime (&dt, &back);
> +
> +  grub_test_assert (g->tm_sec == dt.second, "time %lld bad second: %d vs 
> %d", (long long)v,
>                   g->tm_sec, dt.second);
> -  grub_test_assert (g->tm_min == dt.minute, "time %d bad minute: %d vs %d", 
> v,
> +  grub_test_assert (g->tm_min == dt.minute, "time %lld bad minute: %d vs 
> %d", (long long)v,
>                   g->tm_min, dt.minute);
> -  grub_test_assert (g->tm_hour == dt.hour, "time %d bad hour: %d vs %d", v,
> +  grub_test_assert (g->tm_hour == dt.hour, "time %lld bad hour: %d vs %d", 
> (long long)v,
>                   g->tm_hour, dt.hour);
> -  grub_test_assert (g->tm_mday == dt.day, "time %d bad day: %d vs %d", v,
> +  grub_test_assert (g->tm_mday == dt.day, "time %lld bad day: %d vs %d", 
> (long long)v,
>                   g->tm_mday, dt.day);
> -  grub_test_assert (g->tm_mon + 1 == dt.month, "time %d bad month: %d vs 
> %d", v,
> +  grub_test_assert (g->tm_mon + 1 == dt.month, "time %lld bad month: %d vs 
> %d",(long long)v,
>                   g->tm_mon + 1, dt.month);
>    grub_test_assert (g->tm_year + 1900 == dt.year,
> -                 "time %d bad year: %d vs %d", v,
> +                 "time %lld bad year: %d vs %d", (long long)v,
>                   g->tm_year + 1900, dt.year);
> -  grub_test_assert (g->tm_wday == w, "time %d bad week day: %d vs %d", v,
> +  grub_test_assert (g->tm_wday == w, "time %lld bad week day: %d vs %d", 
> (long long)v,
>                   g->tm_wday, w);
> +  grub_test_assert (back == v, "time %lld bad back transform: %lld", (long 
> long)v,
> +                 (long long)back);
>  }
>
>  static void
>  date_test_iter (void)
>  {
> -  grub_int32_t tests[] = { -1, 0, +1, -2133156255, GRUB_INT32_MIN,
> +  grub_int32_t tests[] = { -1, 0, +1, 978224552, -2133156255, -2110094321, 
> GRUB_INT32_MIN,
>                          GRUB_INT32_MAX };
> +  grub_int64_t tests64[] = { 5774965200LL, 4108700725LL, -5029179792LL };

Where do these numbers come from?

>    unsigned i;
>
>    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE (tests); i++)
> @@ -71,6 +77,17 @@ date_test_iter (void)
>        date_test (x);
>        date_test (-x);
>      }
> +  if (sizeof (time_t) > 4)
> +    {
> +      for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE (tests64); i++)
> +        date_test (tests64[i]);
> +      for (i = 0; i < 10000000; i++)
> +        {
> +          /* Ranges from 0064 to 6869.  */

Why?

> +          grub_int64_t x = rand () + (rand () % 100 - 28) * 
> (grub_uint64_t)GRUB_INT32_MAX;

Nit, wrong coding style for cast. I can see similar problems in other
places too...

Daniel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]